From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Jun 9 19:48:12 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D74233AB8B for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:48:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manu@bidouilliste.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49hLJX09tbz4VX1 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:48:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manu@bidouilliste.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 043AC33AB89; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:48:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0403733AB28 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:48:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manu@bidouilliste.com) Received: from mx.blih.net (mx.blih.net [212.83.155.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mx.blih.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49hLJT6xHPz4VYZ; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:48:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from manu@bidouilliste.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bidouilliste.com; s=mx; t=1591732085; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Lf46Ai7KzUazXAv4Cui7n/0Q2lqmLBs1jG1+fUIfenQ=; b=CcIGUomaGFnt5Rv7vUJqN9ORl7eVwOmEMHstRGG3X0WfgSzuz5fodHSmi3W4dFowwOhK4j I1WSADZ8PrUNer4ll6mOoi8abdW0bqcVkOxSl7mMGzXJvoKgcAZbVAnCdy5bu/CL1cpfoP 5j3D5vaZ85T7sNmy2PRnUfvOpH8jNs4= Received: from skull.home.blih.net (lfbn-idf2-1-900-181.w86-238.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.238.131.181]) by mx.blih.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 64ef5181 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 9 Jun 2020 19:48:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 21:47:56 +0200 From: Emmanuel Vadot To: current@freebsd.org Cc: re@freebsd.org Subject: nightly snapshot for CURRENT ? Message-Id: <20200609214756.13e9cbbc2de12bbb78839875@bidouilliste.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49hLJT6xHPz4VYZ X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bidouilliste.com header.s=mx header.b=CcIGUoma; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=bidouilliste.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of manu@bidouilliste.com designates 212.83.155.74 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=manu@bidouilliste.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.59 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bidouilliste.com:s=mx]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.03)[-1.034]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.993]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bidouilliste.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[bidouilliste.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.07)[-0.067]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12876, ipnet:212.83.128.0/19, country:FR]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 19:48:12 -0000 Hello all, I've just hit again something that I've hit (and probably others too) often. If a change in base break some ports and it's snapshoted in the txz available at download.freebsd.org, you need to wait a week for the next tarball to be available. Since poudriere uses the tarball when you setup a jail it means that the only solution you have is to recreate your jail by building it, and since building world nowdays is very expensive that delay your work too much. Would it be possible to generate the tarballs every day instead of every week ? At least for tier-1 arches. Cheers, -- Emmanuel Vadot