From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 19:48:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B548116A4CE for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 19:48:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail3.speakeasy.net (mail3.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8756543D2F for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 19:48:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 26756 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2004 19:48:51 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 30 Nov 2004 19:48:51 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 8971469; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:48:50 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: kristian pedersen References: <20041130071001.83644.qmail@web25201.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 30 Nov 2004 14:48:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20041130071001.83644.qmail@web25201.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <443byr9kyl.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: hHEEELPP!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ports@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 19:48:51 -0000 kristian pedersen writes: > tools/convconf.c: In function `cofile': > tools/convconf.c:81: error: label at end of compound > statement > *** Error code 1 > > > What need i to fix this?? (its psybnc) I don't have time at the moment to put together the patches for the port, but if you just put a semicolon (";") after the colon (":") on that line, you'll get the compiler to accept the file. [The compiler is right; this code is invalid according to the official definition of the C language. Although it's easy to work around, and earlier versions of gcc probably didn't complain, I don't like the looks of the code...]