From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 00:37:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4E016A4CE; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:37:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from cheer.mahoroba.org (flets20-024.kamome.or.jp [218.45.20.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E09B43D2F; Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:37:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ume@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (IDENT:kYHdusYP4o1wpFtTPLWxZ/A7AQgjbhad/KcWmtjMyMXa/pKYJLwLTXoIWsDTk04e@localhost [IPv6:::1]) (user=ume mech=CRAM-MD5 bits=0)i0R8b9ZS014244 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:37:09 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ume@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:37:09 +0900 Message-ID: From: Hajimu UMEMOTO To: sos@deepcore.dk In-Reply-To: <200401270807.i0R87L9s025832@spider.deepcore.dk> References: <200401270807.i0R87L9s025832@spider.deepcore.dk> User-Agent: xcite1.38> Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOC1MWhsoQg==?=) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on cheer.mahoroba.org cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG cc: sos@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Panasonic KXLC005 support X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:37:31 -0000 Hi, >>>>> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:07:21 +0100 (CET) >>>>> sos@deepcore.dk said: sos> There must be a cleaner way of doing this. if I read it right the only sos> thing you want to have done is to write 0x81 to ALTIO+1 and wait a bit sos> is that correct ? Yes, it's correct. Please feel free to medify it to fit your style. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/