Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 05:55:27 -0800 From: David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: winter@jurai.net, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: UFS quota reference count overflow Message-ID: <20030221135527.GA58235@HAL9000.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20030221.061511.127813063.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20030221032611.GA54489@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030221015809.W66355@sasami.jurai.net> <20030221.061511.127813063.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>: > In message: <20030221015809.W66355@sasami.jurai.net> > "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> writes: > : On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, David Schultz wrote: > : > Am I correct to assume that there probably aren't any modules that would > : > have ABI compatability issues? > : > : Won't systems with existing quotas be forced to recreate their quota > : files? > > Little endian filesystems would be fine. Big endian file systems > would need to regenerate things, no? The patch changes struct dquot, which is not written to the quota file, so that shouldn't be an issue. (dquot just has a reference count and a few memory pointers.) You seem to be thinking of struct dqblk, which stores the actual quotas. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030221135527.GA58235>