From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Aug 30 15:01:31 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA29581 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 30 Aug 1996 15:01:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA29566; Fri, 30 Aug 1996 15:01:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Aug 1996 15:01:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Satoshi Asami Message-Id: <199608302201.PAA29566@freefall.freebsd.org> To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port Question : ghostscript-4.01 (fwd) Cc: matt@bdd.net Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * Another thing we can do is to check and print out a warning if it doesn't * look friendly. This is easy, and I posted a patch here a while ago * (sorry I can't get to my mail archive now). I can commit it if that's * what people want. Actually, I had already committed that patch. ;) === Date: Sun, 18 Aug 1996 03:53:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Satoshi Asami To: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-share@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.port.mk asami 96/08/18 03:53:18 Modified: share/mk bsd.port.mk Log: (1) Use INSTALL_PROGRAM where we attempt to pass this command line to configure. (2) Gently warn user for non-0022 umasks. Submitted by: "David E. O'Brien" (1) Revision Changes Path 1.221 +7 -2 src/share/mk/bsd.port.mk === Well, so there it is. If that's too gentle, we can change it. Actually, there is a problem when the sysadmin changes the umask only during installation (the check is done from do-install), and files generated during earlier steps (like .elc files for emacs) end up being generated mode 640 and copied over with that permission. But we can't cover every base. And if people complain about bsd.port.mk and pkg_add, they should also complain about cp. :) Satoshi