From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 19:45:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (castle.jp.FreeBSD.org [210.226.20.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D20237B403 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 19:45:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet6 id g472jHf80868; Tue, 7 May 2002 11:45:17 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: References: <20020507020339N.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> X-User-Agent: Mew/1.94.2 XEmacs/21.5 (bamboo) X-FaceAnim: (-O_O-)(O_O- )(_O- )(O- )(- -)( -O)( -O_)( -O_O)(-O_O-) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 13 From: Makoto Matsushita To: juha@saarinen.org Subject: Re: BIND in -stable Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 11:45:14 +0900 Message-Id: <20020507114514Q.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG juha> Just out of curiosity, why is version 8.x so desirable, and not juha> 9.x? Why isn't 9.x in the base -STABLE? It's another story and not a scope of my interests. If BIND9 gets enough maturity level for everybody's daily use, it would be a good option for that. But BIND9 is quite different from BIND8 (many existing features are lost by some reasons); I'm afraid that BIND9 for 4-stable breaks POLA. -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message