From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 27 21:51:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6547016A403 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:51:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515B313C4AA for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:51:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04AFD1A4D80; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:51:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 52F4C5157E; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:51:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:51:56 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Michael Proto Message-ID: <20070227215155.GA57597@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200702271059.09230@aldan> <20070227210943.GA56889@xor.obsecurity.org> <200702271624.21474@aldan> <20070227212844.GA57256@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E4A6D1.1020108@jellydonut.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45E4A6D1.1020108@jellydonut.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Alex Kozlov , Mikhail Teterin , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:51:58 -0000 On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:46:57PM -0500, Michael Proto wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:24:21PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > >> The strings "panic" and "-o reserve" are mentioned in neither mdmfs(8) nor in > >> rc.conf(5)... Is one supposed to look elsewhere? > > > > Yes, mdconfig, which is what creates the device (mdmfs is a legacy > > wrapper for 4.x compatibility). > > > > Isn't this backwards? mdconfig is the legacy-compatibility wrapper for > mdmfs, not the other way around. No. DESCRIPTION The mdmfs utility is designed to be a work-alike and look-alike of the deprecated mount_mfs(8). The end result is essentially the same, but is accomplished in a completely different way. The mdmfs utility configures an md(4) disk using mdconfig(8), puts a UFS file system on it using newfs(8), and mounts it using mount(8). Kris