Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:25:06 +0100 From: Bas Smeelen <b.smeelen@ose.nl> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9.1-RELEASE Message-ID: <50B3EC42.2050304@ose.nl> In-Reply-To: <20121126214212.CF2DCE6739@smtp.hushmail.com> References: <20121126214212.CF2DCE6739@smtp.hushmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/26/12 22:42, matt.e@hush.ai wrote: > Hi. With the recent delays from the security incident and the three SAs out of the way, what now are we waiting for? I think we should just get rid of the release schedule on FreeBSD.org if we aren't even going to be close to the set dates. > RC3 has been really stable for me, but we have a no non-release policy on production machines. > We're so far behind compared to http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.1R/schedule.html (which has already been updated multiple times because of delay after delay) Hi Just modify newvers.sh to 9.1-RELEASE recompile and your on RELEASE :) Who has a no non-release policy, management? 9.1-RC3 is working for me very well also
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50B3EC42.2050304>