From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov 26 22:25:10 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45917161
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 22:25:10 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl)
Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C863B8FC0C
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 22:25:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Footer: b3NlLm5s
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl
 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits))
 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:25:06 +0100
Message-ID: <50B3EC42.2050304@ose.nl>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 23:25:06 +0100
From: Bas Smeelen <b.smeelen@ose.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 9.1-RELEASE
References: <20121126214212.CF2DCE6739@smtp.hushmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20121126214212.CF2DCE6739@smtp.hushmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 22:25:10 -0000

On 11/26/12 22:42, matt.e@hush.ai wrote:
> Hi. With the recent delays from the security incident and the three SAs out of the way, what now are we waiting for? I think we should just get rid of the release schedule on FreeBSD.org if we aren't even going to be close to the set dates.
> RC3 has been really stable for me, but we have a no non-release policy on production machines.
> We're so far behind compared to http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.1R/schedule.html (which has already been updated multiple times because of delay after delay)

Hi
Just modify newvers.sh to 9.1-RELEASE recompile and your on RELEASE :)
Who has a no non-release policy, management?

9.1-RC3 is working for me very well also