From owner-freebsd-current Wed Feb 28 9:35:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from ohm.physics.purdue.edu (ohm.physics.purdue.edu [128.210.146.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D300137B719 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:35:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from TrimYourCc@physics.purdue.edu) Received: (from will@localhost) by ohm.physics.purdue.edu (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f1SHZgs15153 for current@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:35:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from TrimYourCc@physics.purdue.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: ohm.physics.purdue.edu: will set sender to TrimYourCc@physics.purdue.edu using -f Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 12:35:42 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ar Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/as Makefile.inc0 src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ld Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ranlib Makefile Message-ID: <20010228123542.N767@ohm.physics.purdue.edu> Reply-To: FreeBSD Current Mail-Followup-To: Will Andrews , FreeBSD Current References: <200102271125.f1RBPig49632@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010227150929.B72398@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010228102308.K767@ohm.physics.purdue.edu> <200102281651.f1SGp8d41759@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ygMS4IY6gunbiOBN" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200102281651.f1SGp8d41759@harmony.village.org>; from imp@harmony.village.org on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:51:08AM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --ygMS4IY6gunbiOBN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [ cc's trimmed, moved to -current ] On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:51:08AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > So long as it is not forced unconditionally to be static. I agree. > b) I've not seen the numbers for this. If it is only 1% faster, it > doesn't make sense, even though it sounds good on paper. I will perform careful benchmarks and publish results. Can people wait until that is done before moving forward please? Give me until Saturday. --=20 wca --ygMS4IY6gunbiOBN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6nTbtF47idPgWcsURAvL0AJ9xqFuUyD3nsu7EHxf9htOeU3je3ACff8u/ ifUtRo4Hi3W4BdIo5ZY91jw= =Ee09 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ygMS4IY6gunbiOBN-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message