Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 11:35:48 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> To: Mel Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com>, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why ports are allowed to be linked with base OpenSSL? Message-ID: <b0dd3e4a-d977-9fe0-51da-e3524f4b2c9f@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <454e2110-9a36-c9f3-e102-ff538abbd616@bluerosetech.com> References: <de742cb7-34e5-97d2-b12b-eb764682327e@rawbw.com> <20171015184133.qw342awio6svrw7v@ivaldir.net> <454e2110-9a36-c9f3-e102-ff538abbd616@bluerosetech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --x9s3K9o6jGBoQE75dc58afoPbuAgNBdtj Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="rI5O5jVt1KxdDVsHJq5touPJqVM3VDiK6"; protected-headers="v1" From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> To: Mel Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com>, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> Cc: "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Message-ID: <b0dd3e4a-d977-9fe0-51da-e3524f4b2c9f@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Why ports are allowed to be linked with base OpenSSL? References: <de742cb7-34e5-97d2-b12b-eb764682327e@rawbw.com> <20171015184133.qw342awio6svrw7v@ivaldir.net> <454e2110-9a36-c9f3-e102-ff538abbd616@bluerosetech.com> In-Reply-To: <454e2110-9a36-c9f3-e102-ff538abbd616@bluerosetech.com> --rI5O5jVt1KxdDVsHJq5touPJqVM3VDiK6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: fr Le 16/10/2017 =C3=A0 00:31, Mel Pilgrim a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: > On 10/15/2017 11:41, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 06:15:24PM +0000, Yuri wrote: >>> Uses/ssl.mk allows SSL_DEFAULT=3Dbase. I know this has been discussed= >>> here >>> before, but why is this even allowed? If some ports are built with >>> SSL_DEFAULT=3Dbase, and some with SSL_DEFAULT=3Dopenssl, this will >>> obviously >>> cause conflicts when two incompatible openssl libraries will be >>> mapped into >>> the same process. >>> >>> >>> Isn't it better to only allow port OpenSSL for ports, and disallow ba= se >>> OpenSSL in ports, so that there will be homogeneity of openssl? >>> >> >> First the default SSL is supposed to be for the entire ports tree, >> not only for >> a bunch of ports. >> >> Second, yes that is the plan but it takes time and it is not that >> easy to make >> it happen :) > > What are the current roadblocks to setting SSL_DEFAULT=3Dopenssl in > ssl.mk? Is there a list of ports that don't compile with the ports > openssl? To have the default SSL be the ports one, you also need the default kerberos to be the ports one, and the ports kerberos (from what I undernstand) is not compatible with the base one. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --rI5O5jVt1KxdDVsHJq5touPJqVM3VDiK6-- --x9s3K9o6jGBoQE75dc58afoPbuAgNBdtj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJZ5H12XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85IUUcQALqQNIFsih2qPQtzt931al2i pd59mH2c3uLEeJP8A0mU/s0fd19hw1GZUyYK7A5VoYAcEnxzXUpjzOAAKPC+BSTm r6l3FEhpiB8c2dJd5dJR0aes8Y4KXCz5BAg0ds1I+OkJ7ja6HfQZJINKkFPJIwIm ycrZ8z/g6haftTZbjAx7hMeEidg2x8XIS9ZYs4eNex6UIcrazqRMbeVxDaOVI5UH bqz9cXCVWYgKwLDPrX9R+yziRJGG0/woyqYoT/eEltF1W1NxlzyeTIV9O9bpz3MT 9fKhvguuO0A73Vy8xXhiq7KkWiwYZWW41vl4t8UmPus1rOe1BV/E/tooFpXA3VJp qXFRzvX9cxSI4weFNkhp5X85oFbjSFgyie45PBZ1jTa01kfjL28Mqs+9ACCKuc3z hFxgiYDi8m5m6kItbqn+6CKC0xR6sN/cH3xaKt+XMgJxOARzjllAodx5UZjPCv/C rBh9Axa9vCDJnToyQC2f/TUXlnOnGM+tlGT/cTmVZUzlVPDfCbwU5/Dpb6ROcn9L BzRyd5ZsiPgD83Qduarw8eNcsSfjtcBOGGYyq46o9OquqI0z8yL+Z0AIgo2LywAs 1t8OWEDWpvS42MOjgc9AKCoBgfVA8OR6xSua7aYrR/s6fBt4as0JJGfo+J4zah+5 EmQbBzzEyQsWtav4nKPX =b72e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --x9s3K9o6jGBoQE75dc58afoPbuAgNBdtj--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b0dd3e4a-d977-9fe0-51da-e3524f4b2c9f>