From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 17 17:33:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73D01065672 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:33:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vinny@abellohome.net) Received: from mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63B98FC08 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:33:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.abellohome.net (ool-44c58eab.dyn.optonline.net [68.197.142.171]) by mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0LXY00AN3CPUKR20@mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:03:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from [155.16.137.131] (noc.tdc.nwt.dellservices.net [216.182.1.100]) by mail.abellohome.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31A7D844B9; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:03:30 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:03:29 -0500 From: Vinny Abello In-reply-to: To: Matthias Gamsjager Message-id: <4F15A9E1.8040805@abellohome.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 References: <4F15532C.7020606@rsu.ru> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Alexander Pyhalov Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.0 and Intel MatrixRAID RAID5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:33:36 -0000 I had something similar on a software based RAID controller on my Intel S5000PSL motherboard when I just went from 8.2-RELEASE to 9.0-RELEASE. After adding geom_raid_load="YES" to my /boot/loader.conf, it still didn't create the device on bootup. I had to manually create the label with graid. After that it created /dev/raid/ar0 for me and I could mount the volume. Only thing which I've trying to understand is the last message below about the integrity check failed. I've found other posts on this but when I dig into my setup, I don't see the same problems that are illustrated in the post and am at a loss for why that is being stated. Also, on other posts I think it was (raid/r0, MBR) that people were getting and trying to fix. Mine is (raid/r0, BSD) which I cannot find reference to. I have a feeling it has to do with the geometry of the disk or something. Everything else seems fine... I admittedly only use this volume for scratch space and didn't have anything important stored on it so I wasn't worried about experimenting or losing data. ada0 at ahcich0 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0 ada0: ATA-7 SATA 1.x device ada0: 150.000MB/s transfers (SATA 1.x, UDMA6, PIO 8192bytes) ada0: Command Queueing enabled ada0: 381554MB (781422768 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) ada0: Previously was known as ad4 ada1 at ahcich1 bus 0 scbus3 target 0 lun 0 ada1: ATA-7 SATA 1.x device ada1: 150.000MB/s transfers (SATA 1.x, UDMA6, PIO 8192bytes) ada1: Command Queueing enabled ada1: 381554MB (781422768 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C) ada1: Previously was known as ad6 GEOM_RAID: Intel-8c840681: Array Intel-8c840681 created. GEOM_RAID: Intel-8c840681: Disk ada0s1 state changed from NONE to ACTIVE. GEOM_RAID: Intel-8c840681: Subdisk ar0:0-ada0s1 state changed from NONE to ACTIVE. GEOM_RAID: Intel-8c840681: Disk ada1s1 state changed from NONE to ACTIVE. GEOM_RAID: Intel-8c840681: Subdisk ar0:1-ada1s1 state changed from NONE to ACTIVE. GEOM_RAID: Intel-8c840681: Array started. GEOM_RAID: Intel-8c840681: Volume ar0 state changed from STARTING to OPTIMAL. GEOM_RAID: Intel-8c840681: Provider raid/r0 for volume ar0 created. GEOM_PART: integrity check failed (raid/r0, BSD) Any ideas on the integrity check anyone? Thanks! -Vinny On 1/17/2012 6:57 AM, Matthias Gamsjager wrote: > Not sure if geom_raid is implemented with cam. I remember a post a while > back about this issue to happen with defaulting cam in 9. Did not follow it > so not sure if something has been done about it. > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: > >> Hello. >> On my desktop I use Intel MatrixRAID RAID5 soft raid controller. RAID5 is >> configured over 3 disks. FreeBSD 8.2 sees this as: >> >> ar0: 953874MB status: READY >> ar0: disk0 READY using ad4 at ata2-master >> ar0: disk1 READY using ad6 at ata3-master >> ar0: disk2 READY using ad12 at ata6-master >> >> Root filesystem is on /dev/ar0s1. >> Today I've tried to upgrade to 9.0. >> It doesn't see this disk array. Here is dmesg. When I load geom_raid, it >> finds something, but doesn't want to work with RAID: >> >> GEOM_RAID: Intel-e922b201: Array Intel-e922b201 created. >> GEOM_RAID: Intel-e922b201: No transformation module found for Volume0. >> GEOM_RAID: Intel-e922b201: Volume Volume0 state changed from STARTING to >> UNSUPPORTED. >> GEOM_RAID: Intel-e922b201: Disk ada2 state changed from NONE to ACTIVE. >> GEOM_RAID: Intel-e922b201: Subdisk Volume0:2-ada2 state changed from NONE >> to ACTIVE. >> GEOM_RAID: Intel-e922b201: Disk ada1 state changed from NONE to ACTIVE. >> GEOM_RAID: Intel-e922b201: Subdisk Volume0:1-ada1 state changed from NONE >> to ACTIVE. >> GEOM_RAID: Intel-e922b201: Disk ada0 state changed from NONE to ACTIVE. >> GEOM_RAID: Intel-e922b201: Subdisk Volume0:0-ada0 state changed from NONE >> to ACTIVE. >> GEOM_RAID: Intel-e922b201: Array started. >> >> No new devices appear in /dev. >> How could I solve this issue? >> -- >> >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"