From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 9 12:27:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239BB16A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:27:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se (limicola.its.UU.SE [130.238.7.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C55D43D1D for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:27:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ante@update.uu.se) Received: by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id 47905C0022; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:27:36 +0200 (MSZ) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by limicola.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s2168; Fri, 9 Apr 04 21:27:29 +0200 Received: from Tempo.Update.UU.SE (Tempo.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F254DF8; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:27:29 +0200 (MSZ) Received: from localhost (amavis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) ESMTP id i39JRS4S003734; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:27:28 +0200 Received: from Tempo.Update.UU.SE (ante@ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1]) ESMTP id i39JRJrS003586; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:27:19 +0200 Received: from localhost (ante@localhost) with ESMTP id i39JRIVV003514; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:27:18 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: Tempo.Update.UU.SE: ante owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:27:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Davour To: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." In-Reply-To: <4076F68C.70909@daleco.biz> Message-ID: References: <4076527F.1060902@users.sourceforge.net> <4076F68C.70909@daleco.biz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 19:27:39 -0000 On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote: > Andreas Davour wrote: > > >Hi! > > > >And it is correct in that there *is* no accessibility/atk port in my new > >cvsup'ed ports tree. But why is it then telling me it needs it!? > > Because it's a dependancy of about 538 distinct > ports, at least one of which you must have > installed.... > > GNOME, perhaps .... 538!! Well, I haven't installed GNOME, but some other port might depend on some GNOME component, I guess. That sounds like an important port. I don't understand why I wasn't getting it when I cvsup'ed then. Is there a line the the ports-supfile which should read 'ports-accessibility'? Maybe I should add it and cvsup again. /andreas