From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 14:48:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75A065B8 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:48:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [IPv6:2001:1470:ff80::25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B232834 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amavis-proxy-ori.ijs.si (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3hN12x4D5mz13X for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:48:09 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ijs.si; h= user-agent:message-id:references:in-reply-to:organization :subject:subject:from:from:date:date:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:mime-version:received:received :received:received; s=jakla2; t=1406645282; x=1409237283; bh=WiR 6m4sZF7yGiB1ioEaFfaH2KXabAyAhLOTvCOK3FDA=; b=c2zVjCm5E7UJhVsVxZ6 OIvby7rtHdgI1OFsglkrDNvXg2P3IKu8P5wvNfDv40kb0F5XeHTmTDhRJ9O1gN+h Akb1VrB0vTd/NHx9YqAgKTYQfUVLOQwrpXA+KMvY0Tj/5KJJqU3/dxXl9Jw6i/SJ 0k/CdhtnEwYb4zfb0j/I5eh4= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si Received: from mail.ijs.si ([IPv6:::1]) by amavis-proxy-ori.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10012) with ESMTP id 4r5EdXG_zkg4 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:48:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mildred.ijs.si (mailbox.ijs.si [IPv6:2001:1470:ff80::143:1]) by mail.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:48:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from neli.ijs.si (neli.ijs.si [IPv6:2001:1470:ff80:88:21c:c0ff:feb1:8c91]) by mildred.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3hN12p1yb1zRw for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:48:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from neli.ijs.si ([2001:1470:ff80:88:21c:c0ff:feb1:8c91]) by neli.ijs.si with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:48:02 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:48:02 +0200 From: Mark Martinec To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD =?UTF-8?Q?=3F=20-=20does?= =?UTF-8?Q?=20it=20have=20one=20=3F?= Organization: J. Stefan Institute In-Reply-To: <201407291320.s6TDK5ZS005328@slippy.cwsent.com> References: <201407291320.s6TDK5ZS005328@slippy.cwsent.com> Message-ID: <444fc5248aaa7d474cf9bde66f3d7f64@mailbox.ijs.si> X-Sender: Mark.Martinec+freebsd@ijs.si User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:48:12 -0000 me wrote: > we are talking about NAT64 (IPv6-only datacenter's path to a legacy > world), > and NPT66 (prefix transalation). I doubt anyone had a traditional NAT > in mind. Kevin Oberman wrote: > No, all of the messages in the thread are specific about NAT66, not > NPT66. > NPT66 may have real value. I hate it, but it may well be better than > alternatives. [...] Cy Schubert wrote: > That I don't disagree with, IPv6 NAT makes no logical sense. Having > said > that I've received emails asking about NAT66 specifically. It is on > people's minds. My impression is that often the term NAT66 is used indiscriminately, even when NPT66 (static prefix translation) is meant. Mark