From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Oct  1 01:15:17 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA27666
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 01:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from word.smith.net.au (vh1.gsoft.com.au [203.38.152.122])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA27659
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 01:15:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from word.smith.net.au (localhost.gsoft.com.au [127.0.0.1])
	by word.smith.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA01232;
	Wed, 1 Oct 1997 17:41:47 +0930 (CST)
Message-Id: <199710010811.RAA01232@word.smith.net.au>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97
To: Richard Jones <richard@a42.deep-thought.org>
cc: Reinier Bezuidenhout <rbezuide@oskar.nanoteq.co.za>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: FreeBSD TCP stack SUX big juicy ones. 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 01 Oct 1997 17:29:06 +1000."
             <m0xGJDX-0024w4C@a42.deep-thought.org> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 1997 17:41:47 +0930
From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> Or maybe the guys at FreeBSD who can answer the question don't even read
> this list coz of the low SNR.

I'd guess that it's probably sitting in half a dozen inboxes with 
mental notes saying "this is weird, worry about it just after I get 
time to breathe".

However your _second_ post is likely to have people deleting both it 
and the first; if your only response to a day or so delay is "complain 
louder" then people are going to ignore you.

If you've got to the point where you can see what's going on, you 
probably have the skill to trace it further.  So go for it!

mike