Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 18 Jul 2004 06:47:37 +0900 (JST)
From:      Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Alex Vasylenko <lxv@omut.org>
Cc:        julian@elischer.org
Subject:   Re: Call for PRs: nullfs
Message-ID:  <200407172147.i6HLlbPL035974@sakura.ninth-nine.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040717195929.GA26144@tadpole.intranet>
References:  <Pine.LNX.4.44.0407160008280.20163-100000@pancho> <40F835D0.8070609@elischer.org> <20040717195929.GA26144@tadpole.intranet>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004 15:59:31 -0400
Alex Vasylenko <lxv@omut.org> wrote:
> I find the performance of nullfs somewhat lacking as measured in the test
> described below (a config with nullfs performs worse (~2x slower) than the same
> config with vnodefs). For simplicity the test was done in chroot, doing it in a
> jail has no significant impact on performance.

	Wow, I confirmed this behavior with 'make buildworld' on
	5-current(2004/7/2, SMP).

	nullfs mounted /usr/src, /usr/obj:	about 5000sec
	ln -s'ed /usr/src, /usr/obj:		about 3000sec



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200407172147.i6HLlbPL035974>