From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 8 09:18:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C9DA16A4CE; Sat, 8 Nov 2003 09:18:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.mail.ru (mx1.mail.ru [194.67.23.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B978643FBF; Sat, 8 Nov 2003 09:18:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kabaev@mail.ru) Received: from [141.154.215.11] (port=64365 helo=kan.dnsalias.net) by mx1.mail.ru with esmtp id 1AIWj8-000Bcb-00; Sat, 08 Nov 2003 20:18:22 +0300 Received: from kan.dnsalias.net (ak03@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kan.dnsalias.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hA8HILdb051935; Sat, 8 Nov 2003 12:18:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kan@kan.dnsalias.net) Received: (from kan@localhost) by kan.dnsalias.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hA8HIK2E051934; Sat, 8 Nov 2003 12:18:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kan) Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 12:18:20 -0500 From: Alexander Kabaev To: Jens Rehsack Message-Id: <20031108121820.084fe503.kabaev@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <3FAD22FA.7030105@liwing.de> References: <3FAD22FA.7030105@liwing.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6claws65 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected cc: Alexander Kabaev cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Bug optimization/11741] internal compiler error at gcse.c:5318] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 17:18:24 -0000 On Sat, 08 Nov 2003 17:08:10 +0000 Jens Rehsack wrote: > Maybe at a good time the next snapshot should be imported into > freebsd to get this fix, too :-) > > Some ports (eg. mysql40, apache) are switchable to high optimization > where a bug in gcse could cause invalid code which will be removed > with the patch for this bug. > Sure, I'll let the system to settle after last snapshot as it is still not clear whether or not it has broken anything. -- Alexander Kabaev