From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Feb 11 17:44:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CF037B401 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 17:44:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (robert@fledge.pr.watson.org [192.0.2.3]) by fledge.watson.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f1C1hnh80854; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 20:43:49 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 20:43:48 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Peter Wemm Cc: Drew Derbyshire , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Postfix and Majordomo security (was FreeBSD Ports Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-01:INSERT_NUMBER_HERE) In-Reply-To: <200102111357.f1BDvGU36876@mobile.wemm.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Peter Wemm wrote: > Regarding spam, the thought just occurred to me that we can catch a lot > of it by checking that the list name appears in a To: or CC: line > somewhere. eg: If mail to -current does not have > '.*current@freebsd.org' in the To: or CC: line (most spam has got > fakeuser@hotmail.com or something), then bounce it. Hmm. I kind of liked being able to Bcc: lists, especially given that (last I checked) we had some magic somewhere to bound cross-posts. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project robert@fledge.watson.org NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message