From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 20:49:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4783F16A41A for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 20:49:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregoryd.freebsd@free.fr) Received: from smtp8-g19.free.fr (smtp8-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079FB13C442 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 20:49:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregoryd.freebsd@free.fr) Received: from smtp8-g19.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp8-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD83B17F515; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:49:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from imp6-g19.free.fr (imp6-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.6]) by smtp8-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959B317F875; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:49:34 +0100 (CET) Received: by imp6-g19.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id 5EB4F43A1; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:49:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from mar44-4-88-161-154-223.fbx.proxad.net (mar44-4-88-161-154-223.fbx.proxad.net [88.161.154.223]) by imp.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:49:27 +0100 Message-ID: <1202158167.47a77a572701f@imp.free.fr> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:49:27 +0100 From: gregoryd.freebsd@free.fr To: Kris Kennaway References: <47A6D272.2000406@gmail.com> <47A6D420.5050700@delphij.net> <1202156029.47a771fda5d1c@imp.free.fr> <47A773AD.1010108@delphij.net> <47A7749B.8070100@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <47A7749B.8070100@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.8 X-Originating-IP: 88.161.154.223 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, d@delphij.net Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE trouble after ugrade 6.2-RELEASE -> 6.3-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:49:39 -0000 Quoting Kris Kennaway : > Yes, there is no possibility of ULE 2.0 being merged to 6.x. Use it in > 6.x if you dare, just don't complain to us if it breaks your system :-) All right, I won't :-) > i.e. if at any point you start experiencing problems, do not report them > until you have verified that they persist with 4BSD also. I can hear you. Then again, I'm in the slow process of converting people in my office to use FreeBSD instead of GNU/Linux: it's not going to be easy if 6.3 4BSD exhibits slownesses when compiling a kernel, and 6.3 ULE might prove not that stable :-\ (I've not encountered any problem until now, though, and I'm "touching wood" as my granny says) By the way, why still include ULE in 6.x if it is to be avoided ? gregory