From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct  7 15:31:13 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C4C106568A
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue,  7 Oct 2008 15:31:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com)
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.229])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0B58FC23
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue,  7 Oct 2008 15:31:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rysto32@gmail.com)
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s17so752385wxc.7
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 08:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
	:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	bh=CvqsF8ROddQh9/aKqAit8kNV/kdDBGKxMRrAoRp5l70=;
	b=G8gmRt+92TNsJ7PoWdSeK1jO/urQUczoItoU6jh8DTHHn7KDtVdnIz//XIc4phpRJR
	EUvI/BOhXTIlK3NnNIjKs7O1DpqGa1UM5VSaBxAl4AUrWMn3Q54z1IzZggteHRwK6Xq2
	V2BHc2Hi88z0lXTxvZYJMOUF965zOe+a1LWe8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
	:references;
	b=XSJuynK+hc6nmRBVcZSS8+UByeRwxOPvOru3vd4zppDJiHagfRyCztBn4UKj3rvkKe
	X1qLHlNkB2lOA8oxb8bcm6russgmiQY7XeIXU+3yT47dTCKASwcHlERlPCyggzcAzi+e
	PDukGGtqF5B8i3un+K9eJopvhxCRYAQ2CM/50=
Received: by 10.150.203.8 with SMTP id a8mr9972753ybg.121.1223393471957;
	Tue, 07 Oct 2008 08:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.150.97.16 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 08:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <bc2d970810070831nb19a8f7ibfd7878bf6b2e4aa@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:31:11 -0400
From: "Ryan Stone" <rysto32@gmail.com>
To: "Joseph Koshy" <joseph.koshy@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <84dead720810062102r2baf0e32y10594d3f1d07120d@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <bc2d970810061328p794782aaxed78dc1a32077ec6@mail.gmail.com>
	<84dead720810062102r2baf0e32y10594d3f1d07120d@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: pmcstat: should it fail when a cpu is disabled?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:31:13 -0000

Is it intentional that pmcstat -c '*' <whatever> does not use the
haltedcpus mask while pmcstat <whatever> will?

Ryan Stone