From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Oct 12 08:10:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75201C0D163 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 08:10:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp207.alice.it (smtp207.alice.it [82.57.200.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0947D905 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 08:10:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (79.46.7.147) by smtp207.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 57C7E4C007CCE7D5; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:05:00 +0200 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u9C84wdI049261; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:04:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.ventu: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: harder and harder to avoid pkg To: Matthieu Volat , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" References: <638fe078-80db-2492-90be-f1280eb8d445@freebsd.org> <20161012092403.66a41d9e@freedom.alkumuna.eu> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <00f3768e-f57a-661c-aa62-89cdf10926bd@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:04:58 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161012092403.66a41d9e@freedom.alkumuna.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 08:10:42 -0000 On 10/12/16 09:24, Matthieu Volat wrote: > And GNU/Linuxes can be a PITA when you have to track -dev(el) packages (which sometimes really requires -bin, -app or whatever), or worst, describe to people how they are supposed to build your software with weird subpackage names. > > I really like that ports provides the software project as intended by upstream (modulo options). Just a "me too" here! bye av.