From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 14 08:33:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D9816A4CE for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:33:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from alicia.nttmcl.com (alicia.nttmcl.com [216.69.69.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A508C43D31 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:33:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kelly@nttmcl.com) Received: from alicia.nttmcl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alicia.nttmcl.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1E8XPlD046727; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:33:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kelly@nttmcl.com) Received: from localhost (kelly@localhost)j1E8XKcd046721; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:33:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kelly@nttmcl.com) X-Authentication-Warning: alicia.nttmcl.com: kelly owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:33:20 -0800 (PST) From: Kelly Yancey To: Bruce M Simpson In-Reply-To: <20050212071925.GB726@empiric.icir.org> Message-ID: <20050214003253.M46708@alicia.nttmcl.com> References: <20050211125850.B9541@alicia.nttmcl.com> <20050212071925.GB726@empiric.icir.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Patch to set TCP_NOPUSH on libfetch HTTP connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:33:26 -0000 On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 01:34:21PM -0800, Kelly Yancey wrote: >> Thus reducing the number of packets on the wire from 14 to 9. Obviously >> for larger transfers, the difference gets lost in the noise. Nonetheless, >> unless someone spots some undesireable side-effect that may be caused >> by the change, I'll commit the attached patch in a few days. > > Aren't there situations where the write-path should be kept open e.g. > in HTTP/1.1 ? > That fetch uses? No. Kelly