From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Apr 2 17:30:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from picusnet.com (mail.picusnet.com [207.7.90.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E398937BC00 for ; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 17:30:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wdf@picusnet.com) Received: from picusnet.com [209.96.235.49] by picusnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-5.05) id A5C11BFB0108; Sun, 02 Apr 2000 20:28:49 -0400 Received: (from wdf@localhost) by picusnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA47904 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 2 Apr 2000 19:31:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wdf) Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 19:31:40 -0400 From: William Freeman To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: xfs and freebsd? Message-ID: <20000402193140.A43016@gwernache.picusnet.com> Reply-To: William Freeman References: <20000403022421.A13027@ibb0021.ibb.uu.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: <20000403022421.A13027@ibb0021.ibb.uu.nl> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Do you mean like replece the FFS with XFS, thus giving even more performance over that nasty ext2fs thing Linux-based systems use, or just support it as a KLD option or so? William Freeman http://members.xoom.com/EvilGNU -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GU d- s+:+ a--- C++ UB+++ P+ L- E--- W+ N o-- K- w--- O- M- V-- PS+ PE++ Y-- PGP-- t++ 5-- X+++ R tv- b+ DI++++ D--- G- e- h! r-- !y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message