Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 15:07:37 -0500 From: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: Larry Rosenman <ler@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: bd12c83965dd - main - net/boinc_curses: adopt, portfmt Message-ID: <ca30e7d6184bdd159eee0d66b50451c2@lerctr.org> In-Reply-To: <YvPvS2bsAHUAA9wR@FreeBSD.org> References: <202208101705.27AH5Ucm054259@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <YvPtmMoiL0NpdTTz@FreeBSD.org> <f4d06c14-907b-45e5-a47e-471d156c759c@lerctr.org> <YvPvS2bsAHUAA9wR@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/10/2022 12:47 pm, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 05:41:43PM +0000, Larry Rosenman wrote: >> From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> >> > ... >> > Just wondering what's the rationale for this change? Previously 'twas >> > one perfectly readable line which fit the ~80 char terminal width with >> > some extra slack. We do wrap overly long lines, but why here? >> >> Portfmt did it. Not sure [about] rationale. > > Looks like a bug in portfmt. FWIW it's just a linting tool, and thus > its advice should not be followed blindly. > > ./danfe What major difference does it make? the port works, and portfmt makes it somewhat cleaner. Are you the local police for this stuff? -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 5708 Sabbia Dr, Round Rock, TX 78665-2106
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ca30e7d6184bdd159eee0d66b50451c2>