From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 4 05:02:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548C016A403; Sat, 4 Nov 2006 05:02:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA3C43D58; Sat, 4 Nov 2006 05:02:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kA452YLx092717; Sat, 4 Nov 2006 00:02:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id kA452YK6086204 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 4 Nov 2006 00:02:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <200611040502.kA452YK6086204@lava.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 00:04:43 -0500 To: "Jack Vogel" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-net From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0611031816n1af99819rdc6b99e9dd2deb7c@mail.gmail.co m> References: <2a41acea0611031816n1af99819rdc6b99e9dd2deb7c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.3, clamav-milter version 0.88.3 on clamscanner2 X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: New em patch for 6.2 BETA 3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 05:02:36 -0000 At 09:16 PM 11/3/2006, Jack Vogel wrote: >I, and re, would very much appreciate any test feedback you can Thanks very much for working on this! I was not able to easily reproduce the timeouts in the first place, but so far on the one box I have been testing, it seems to be fine (netrate with various small packets). I will load up some more boxes tomorrow and see how it goes. I tested on an acpi0: on motherboard with the onboard NIC. ---Mike