From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 18 20:08:09 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61DFE106566B
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:08:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl)
Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A0D8FC0A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:08:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com)
	by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl>) id 1SgiF6-00085E-Fq
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 13:08:08 -0700
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 13:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <1340050088483-5719484.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206182129440.45874@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206161815550.41364@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<op.wf0i64pg34t2sn@me-pc>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206172212440.2506@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<op.wf3upvdc34t2sn@tech304>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206181749160.78762@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<op.wf3wd8vf34t2sn@tech304>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206181829210.99007@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<CAHhngE0eLR9PEoyn2TLuV7+z7NtsHMgdsj6YbSm3ZQijDxTNjw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FDF8054.9030906@fisglobal.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206182129440.45874@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Why Clang
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:08:09 -0000

That's interesting discussion. 

I hit some cases where clang produced binaries were 
clearly faster than those made with latest gcc. But it's far 
from rule.

Where you have found statements that clang is always 
faster than gcc? 

>From my perspective, it's almost as good OR better
than gcc, with potential for further improvement and
nice license, errors etc. Fair enough.

--
View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Why-Clang-tp5715861p5719484.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.