From owner-cvs-all Tue May 25 15:23:54 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from ceia.nordier.com (m2-33-dbn.dial-up.net [196.34.155.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3683150C3; Tue, 25 May 1999 15:23:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rnordier@nordier.com) Received: (from rnordier@localhost) by ceia.nordier.com (8.8.7/8.6.12) id AAA17260; Wed, 26 May 1999 00:23:02 +0200 (SAST) From: Robert Nordier Message-Id: <199905252223.AAA17260@ceia.nordier.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/boot/biosboot table.c In-Reply-To: <374B1422.79F6707@newsguy.com> from "Daniel C. Sobral" at "May 26, 1999 06:20:34 am" To: dcs@newsguy.com (Daniel C. Sobral) Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 00:23:00 +0200 (SAST) Cc: rnordier@nordier.com (Robert Nordier), cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > Robert Nordier wrote: > > > > I'm just not up on the legal side of things: how does "Adaptive > > Huffman Coding" stand in the patent world? > > Interestingly, that's my concern too. Huffman encoding is poor > though. It is used to pre or post-compress a dictionary algorithm in > almost any decent compression algorithm. The exception (which I > think is used by bzip) requires too much memory to uncompress. He calls it "Adaptive Huffman", though I think the emphasis is strongly on the "adaptive" part. The compression rates were a few percentage points better than pkzip (the Phil Katz utility that zip/unzip, etc. derive from) when I last tried it. It was just about twice as slow, though, as I recall. -- Robert Nordier To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message