From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 29 15:49:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A264C1065672 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:49:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yousif@alumni.jmu.edu) Received: from coruscant.far-far-away.us (coruscant.far-far-away.us [70.91.196.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 231E08FC30 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:49:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yousif@alumni.jmu.edu) Received: (qmail 38896 invoked from network); 29 Feb 2008 10:43:41 -0500 Received: from pknat1.passkey.com (HELO alderaan) (68.162.198.134) by coruscant.far-far-away.us with SMTP; 29 Feb 2008 10:43:41 -0500 Message-ID: <863014ECF11048B78C23D1D31DCAFF40@alderaan> From: "Yousif Hassan" To: "Anish Mistry" References: <200802281645.00286.mistry.7@osu.edu> <47C73E8E.40706@gmail.com> <200802291045.39977.mistry.7@osu.edu> In-Reply-To: <200802291045.39977.mistry.7@osu.edu> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:50:48 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6000.16480 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16545 Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fujitsu P8010: est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:49:53 -0000 On Friday 29 February 2008, Anish Mistry wrote: > On Friday 29 February 2008, Yousif Hassan wrote: > > Anish Mistry wrote: > >> I got a new Fujitsu P8010 and est doesn't seem to attach to my > >> dual core processor since it doesn't recognize the CPU. My > >> dmesg is linked at the end of the email. Is there anything I > >> can do to add it? >>Anish, are you running amd64? This seems to be a recurring theme >>with amd64, based on some research I did and based on my anecdotal >> evidence. >Yes, I'm running amd64. If you're willing, try an i386 kernel and see if the est driver attaches. If using i386 isn't a non-starter for you, that's a workaround. That said, I still hope someone who knows this stuff can comment on this definitively. It seems odd that i386 attaches est fine, but amd64 doesn't. --Yousif