From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 13 08:44:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6339B1065740; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:44:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93098FC1B; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:44:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FBE9F1.dip.t-dialin.net [217.251.233.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p8D8i7mY012460; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:44:08 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p8D8hnEB028127; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:44:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8CLIEjZ095398; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 21:19:39 GMT (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201109122119.p8CLIEjZ095398@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Matthias Andree From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Fri, 09 Sep 2011 18:06:30 +0200." <4E6A3986.6030505@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:18:14 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports-system priorities rant (Re: sysutils/cfs) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:44:10 -0000 Matthias Andree wrote: > >> An obscure piece of software is undesirable (and shouldn't be ported in > >> the first place). > > > > Bullshit! > > I think that suffices. If the discussion is getting emotional, we > should stop it. No. You should stop advocating killing ports, or leave, or be revoked. FreeBSD would be better without immature ports slaughterers. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below, not above; Indent with "> "; Cumulative like a play script. Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. http://www.softwarefreedomday.org 17 Sept, http://berklix.org/sfd/ 22 Oct.