From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 14 01:38:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826CD16A4CE; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 01:38:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5571843D58; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 01:38:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id 4A2475CA4E; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 18:38:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 18:38:42 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Jeff Roberson Message-ID: <20050414013842.GH60345@elvis.mu.org> References: <200504131059.j3DAxAUf039007@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050413195741.GE60345@elvis.mu.org> <20050413182958.L28571@mail.chesapeake.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050413182958.L28571@mail.chesapeake.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: Jeff Roberson cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/coda coda_vnops.c src/sys/compat/linux linux_getcwd.c src/sys/fs/devfs devfs_vnops.c src/sys/fs/hpfs hpfs_vnops.c src/sys/fs/msdosfs msdosfs_lookup.c src/sys/fs/nwfs nwfs_vnops X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 01:38:42 -0000 * Jeff Roberson [050413 15:31] wrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > * Jeff Roberson [050413 03:59] wrote: > > > jeff 2005-04-13 10:59:10 UTC > > > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > > > Modified files: > > > sys/coda coda_vnops.c > > > sys/compat/linux linux_getcwd.c > > > Log: > > > - Change all filesystems and vfs_cache to relock the dvp once the child is > > > locked in the ISDOTDOT case. Se vfs_lookup.c r1.79 for details. > > > > Sorry to bumble into your way, but can you explain this? I thought > > the lock order was always dvp->vp, doing a vp->dvp lock is a reversal > > and can cause deadlock. I guess I'm missing something, can you explain > > please? > > For ISDOTDOT dvp is really the child of vp. For example > > a/b/c > > b/.. is a, and a must be locked before b. So b must be unlocked before we > can lock ..(a), and then b must be locked again. Ok thanks! -- - Alfred Perlstein - email: bright@mu.org cell: 408-480-4684