From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Jul 15 2: 7: 2 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mail.ftf.dk (mail.ftf.net [129.142.64.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5991508C for ; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 02:06:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from regnauld@ftf.net) Received: from ns.int.ftf.net (fw2.ftf.dk [192.168.1.2] (may be forged)) by mail.ftf.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3/gw-ftf-1.2) with ESMTP id LAA01358; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 11:05:24 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.ftf.dk: Host fw2.ftf.dk [192.168.1.2] (may be forged) claimed to be ns.int.ftf.net Received: (from regnauld@localhost) by ns.int.ftf.net (8.9.2/8.9.3) id LAA22376; Thu, 15 Jul 1999 11:19:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <19990715111944.47234@ns.int.ftf.net> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 11:19:44 +0200 From: Phil Regnauld To: David Schwartz Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NT vs Linux vs FreeBSD References: <000101bece5d$1a9b0540$021d85d1@youwant.to> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e In-Reply-To: <000101bece5d$1a9b0540$021d85d1@youwant.to>; from David Schwartz on Wed, Jul 14, 1999 at 05:58:08PM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE i386 Organization: FTFnet Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org David Schwartz writes: > > > example, the NTP people dropped official support of Linux because of the > > frequency of changes to the kernel, as well as the difficulty in making it > > work on all flavours of Linux. They mentioned FreeBSD specifically as a > > more stable platform developer-wise. > > Amusing, considering that the latest versions of NTP run fine on Linux and > break on FreeBSD. Ever tried compiling GateD on linux ? *snicker* To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message