From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 24 22:46:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6953A85B for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 22:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2.funkthat.com (gate2.funkthat.com [208.87.223.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 461482A22 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 22:46:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2.funkthat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by h2.funkthat.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id rAOMkKQs051493 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 24 Nov 2013 14:46:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmg@h2.funkthat.com) Received: (from jmg@localhost) by h2.funkthat.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id rAOMkKPl051492; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 14:46:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmg) Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 14:46:20 -0800 From: John-Mark Gurney To: Warren Block Subject: Re: What are the limits for FFS file systems? 10+ years out of date.. Message-ID: <20131124224620.GR7069@funkthat.com> References: <20131124061218.GQ7069@funkthat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE i386 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 54BA 873B 6515 3F10 9E88 9322 9CB1 8F74 6D3F A396 X-Files: The truth is out there X-URL: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/ X-Resume: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/resume.html X-to-the-FBI-CIA-and-NSA: HI! HOW YA DOIN? can i haz chizburger? X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (h2.funkthat.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 24 Nov 2013 14:46:20 -0800 (PST) Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 22:46:22 -0000 Warren Block wrote this message on Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 07:21 -0700: > On Sat, 23 Nov 2013, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > >Attached is a patch that bring this up to date.. This was written back > >when we were using UFS1 w/ 32bit block addresses... Things have changes > >now that UFS2 is standard... > > > >The big thing is listing the memory requirements for fsck as the main > >limiting factor on FS size... > > > >I've had Kirk review the patch, and he's fine w/ it... > > > >Shall I just commit it? > > fsck should be either &man.fsck.8; or fsck, depending > on context. > > There is a duplicated "the" in the first paragraph. igor -Rz should be > run on the patched file. This is a single reply, thanks to the three of you for reviewing the patch.. it's now committed in r43236.. Oh, I did change a such as to e.g., and in doing so, I noticed an e.g. w/o the trailing period... wondering if we should be consistent and add it? -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."