Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 6 Sep 2001 18:56:40 -0500
From:      Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>
To:        Salvo Bartolotta <bartequi@neomedia.it>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Good practice for /tmp
Message-ID:  <15256.3384.39546.241663@guru.mired.org>
In-Reply-To: <999814880.3b97f6e003967@webmail.neomedia.it>
References:  <999807502.3b97da0e9af9f@webmail.neomedia.it> <15255.61590.455896.440737@guru.mired.org> <999814880.3b97f6e003967@webmail.neomedia.it>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Salvo Bartolotta <bartequi@neomedia.it> types:
> > While it's certainly correct that the system runs better with swap - a
> > minimum of 256MB is recommended by tuning(7) - that doesn't mean it
> > absolutely has to have any swap at all.
> IIRC, some people complained about FreeBSD always using swap. I can now assume 
> there is no such "problem".

This sounds like a FAQ. In particular, this one: <URL:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/misc.html#MORE-SWAP
>.

	<mike
--
Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>			http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/
Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15256.3384.39546.241663>