From nobody Sun Dec 22 02:22:37 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-net@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4YG4gY2Sz2z5hrQq for ; Sun, 22 Dec 2024 02:22:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@catflap.org) Received: from donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net [IPv6:2001:19f0:7400:8808:123::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4YG4gX6jYxz46B8; Sun, 22 Dec 2024 02:22:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@catflap.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Catflap-Envelope-From: X-Catflap-Envelope-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net [209.250.224.51]) by donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 4BM2McbZ055637; Sun, 22 Dec 2024 02:22:38 GMT (envelope-from jamie@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id 4BM2MboS055636; Sun, 22 Dec 2024 02:22:37 GMT (envelope-from jamie) From: Jamie Landeg-Jones Message-Id: <202412220222.4BM2MboS055636@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 02:22:37 +0000 Organization: Dyslexic Fish To: markj@FreeBSD.org, bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: per-FIB socket binding References: <4p5o59s4-5p70-0775-1479-990o1s5po7r2@yvfgf.mnoonqbm.arg> In-Reply-To: <4p5o59s4-5p70-0775-1479-990o1s5po7r2@yvfgf.mnoonqbm.arg> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net [209.250.224.51]); Sun, 22 Dec 2024 02:22:38 +0000 (GMT) X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:2001:19f0:7400::/38, country:US] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4YG4gX6jYxz46B8 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- "Bjoern A. Zeeb" wrote: > I wonder if anyone on FreeBSD is using FIBs to actually have multi-FIB > forwardig but that very little touches your use case apart from the mgmt > which again can be factored out better (or inversely, factoring out the > forwarding). > > I would honestly know who and how FIBs are still in use today or if they > should be put on a list to be removed for 16 (I assume I might be > surprised). I hope that is a joke! FIBs are a must have for certain routing environments, and forcing them into a VNET jail would add to overheads, and not even work for applications that work with 2 or more FIBs in the same instance!