From owner-freebsd-java  Fri Nov 15 20:10:34 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF99937B401
	for <freebsd-java@freebsd.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:10:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gnuppy.monkey.org (wsip68-15-8-100.sd.sd.cox.net [68.15.8.100])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB1D43E42
	for <freebsd-java@freebsd.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:10:33 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from billh@gnuppy.monkey.org)
Received: from billh by gnuppy.monkey.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18CuFu-0001PH-00; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:08:26 -0800
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 20:08:26 -0800
To: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com>
Cc: "Georg-W. Koltermann" <g.w.k@web.de>, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG,
	"Bill Huey (Hui)" <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>
Subject: Re: Trying to compile HotSpot on 4.7-STABLE
Message-ID: <20021116040826.GA5398@gnuppy.monkey.org>
References: <1037283323.18267.30.camel@hunter.muc.macsch.com> <20021115003621.GA3359@gnuppy.monkey.org> <20021115140058.A19732@misty.eyesbeyond.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021115140058.A19732@misty.eyesbeyond.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
From: Bill Huey (Hui) <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-java.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-java>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-java>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 02:00:59PM +1030, Greg Lewis wrote:
> We're due for 1.3.1 patchset 8 but there are a few things holding it up.
> If you're about to do major reworking though that seems to make it more
> likely that we'll wait for what you're doing.

Yeah, sort of, but some of this patch release stuff should still be automated
so that the release process isn't contingent on a single individual. Then folks
can deal with experimental patches verses stuff that's stable, which is analogous
to FreeBSD OS versioning. A nightly build/patch set should be fine, like what the
Mozilla folks have.

bill


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message