From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Mar 3 23:39:39 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3BC14DE4 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 1999 23:39:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.8/8.8.6) id AAA19899; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 00:39:09 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <4.1.19990303115907.00978890@localhost> Message-Id: <4.1.19990303115907.00978890@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 12:00:16 -0700 To: The Hermit Hacker , Nocturne From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Guess we've lost the server market too...? Cc: "Matthew D. Fuller" , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <36DD11AE.7EE0CF6E@uswest.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 09:00 AM 3/3/99 -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote: >Here's a thought...due to the whole QT licensing issue a while back, KDE >appears to have gotten a bad name in the Linux community. I believe >RedHat went from distributing/backing KDE to moving tover to Gnome, as a >result...now that that issue is under-the-bridge, so to say, why don't we >jump behind the KDE developers? And get them to jump behind us? I've proposed before that they relicense under the MIT X license and serve as the default desktop for FreeBSD. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message