From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 15 18:52:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895C516A41F for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:52:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dworkin@village.org) Received: from green-dome.village.org (green-dome.village.org [168.103.84.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A26A43D5F for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:52:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dworkin@village.org) Received: from green-dome.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by green-dome.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id jBFIqWm05440 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:52:32 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200512151852.jBFIqWm05440@green-dome.village.org> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org From: dlm-fb@weaselfish.com In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:14:37 +0100 Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:52:32 -0700 Subject: Re: filesystem full - freebsd 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:52:38 -0000 Oliver Fromme wrote: : I considered mentioning the fragments issue, too, but I : don't think it applies in this case. His file system is : 22 Gbyte with 6 Gbyte free. I think it is very unlikely : that those 6 Gbyte are all fragments. I've had 100GB+ filesystems that were 50% full, and everything free was an isolated fragment (or short run but under the size of a block). Web caches, news, and similar small-file applications can be pretty pessimal for ufs, so mentioning the possibility seemed worthwhile. Dworkin