From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 19 17:51:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC8E16A41F for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:51:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wxs@syn.csh.rit.edu) Received: from syn.csh.rit.edu (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30C343D46 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:51:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wxs@syn.csh.rit.edu) Received: from syn.csh.rit.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by syn.csh.rit.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0JHqTtR071849; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:52:29 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wxs@syn.csh.rit.edu) Received: (from wxs@localhost) by syn.csh.rit.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0JHqOPj071848; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:52:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wxs) Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:52:24 -0500 From: Wesley Shields To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20060119175224.GA71633@csh.rit.edu> References: <79e2026f0601142345x1a9269bdl3153d1bb110be08d@mail.gmail.com> <86ek34d35f.fsf@xps.des.no> <17359.49899.183831.844670@bhuda.mired.org> <86k6cww445.fsf@xps.des.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86k6cww445.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Ashok Shrestha , Brandon Flowers , Mike Meyer , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: speed up port compiling using RAM (tmpfs) ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:51:13 -0000 On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 05:54:02PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Mike Meyer writes: > > Will using a swap-backed disk change anything? > > Not really. > > > How about the best way to configure things to use two disks for the > > compile? > > I'm not sure what you are trying to achieve. Unlike the base system, > the ports tree does not use separate source and object directories. I think he is trying to get at a scenario where WRKDIR is on a seperate disk from the one /usr/ports is on. To answer his question, assuming this is what he is going, for why not just add a new physical disk to the system per the handbook, and set WRKDIR to be where ever that disk is mounted. -- WXS