From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr  9 12:34:32 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 941D816A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri,  9 Apr 2004 12:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from limicola.its.uu.se (limicola.its.UU.SE [130.238.7.33])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E87043D31
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri,  9 Apr 2004 12:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ante@update.uu.se)
Received: by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205)
	id 75173C0040; Fri,  9 Apr 2004 21:34:30 +0200 (MSZ)
Received: from limicola.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by limicola.its.uu.se via
	virus-scan 	id s2172; Fri, 9 Apr 04 21:34:20 +0200
Received: from Tempo.Update.UU.SE (Tempo.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.17])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEA54DF8;
	Fri,  9 Apr 2004 21:34:19 +0200 (MSZ)
Received: from localhost (amavis@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	ESMTP id i39JYI4S004635;	Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:34:19 +0200
Received: from Tempo.Update.UU.SE (ante@ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1])
	ESMTP id i39JYArS004628;	Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:34:10 +0200
Received: from localhost (ante@localhost)
	with ESMTP id i39JYAJ6004625;	Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:34:10 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: Tempo.Update.UU.SE: ante owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:34:09 +0200 (CEST)
From: Andreas Davour <ante@update.uu.se>
To: Martin Hudec <corwin@aeternal.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040409192512.GB12347@pleiades.aeternal.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404092128180.28354@Tempo.Update.UU.SE>
References: <4076527F.1060902@users.sourceforge.net>
 <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404092042560.28354@Tempo.Update.UU.SE>
 <20040409192512.GB12347@pleiades.aeternal.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 19:34:32 -0000

On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Martin Hudec wrote:

> Hi Andreas,
>
> 	don't you really have atk in /usr/ports/accessibility/atk directory?

No.

> Perhaps look into ports-supfile.. do you have there ports-all enabled?

No, I have it commented out, since I left all the individual ports
collections in there instead, except for arabic, hebrew and some other
exotic languages.

Could it be I have made such a basic mistake as to not cvsup'ed a vital
dependedcy?! I kind of figured the newly cvsup'ed port of cvsup would have
included a new example file of ports-supfile if that had been the problem.

One should never *expect* a computer to do something I guess.

Would something strange happen now if I added a line for
'ports-accessability' in my ports-supfile and tried to cvsup again?

I guess I *really* should do a pkgdb -Uu then?

/Andreas