From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 25 21:44:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6F216A4CE for ; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 21:44:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from sis1.snu.ac.kr (sis1.snu.ac.kr [147.46.10.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A681E43D39 for ; Thu, 25 Dec 2003 21:44:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nospam@users.sourceforge.net) Received: from users.sourceforge.net ([147.46.44.183]) by sis1.snu.ac.kr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBQ5fc1i154212 for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 14:41:39 +0900 Message-ID: <3FEBCAAD.6050401@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 14:44:13 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031104 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: port installs: /usr/X11R6/bin versus /usr/local/bin ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 05:44:14 -0000 Hi, Why do I have, for example, /usr/local/bin/netscape and /usr/X11R6/bin/mozilla ? Applications from ports are randomly distributed over these two directories, which I believe, is a bad strategy. I can figure that exclusively the XFree86 ports may put files in /usr/X11R6, but that should not allow other ports to add files into the same directory. Why is there no stricter policy on port installs to put files only in /usr/local ? Regards, Rob.