From owner-freebsd-current Tue May 6 10:27:37 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA22827 for current-outgoing; Tue, 6 May 1997 10:27:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA22822 for ; Tue, 6 May 1997 10:27:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA18499; Tue, 6 May 1997 13:27:25 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 13:27:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199705061727.NAA18499@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Kenjiro Cho Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: PRU_OLDSTYLE in current In-Reply-To: <199705061629.BAA01994@hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp> References: <199705061629.BAA01994@hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp> Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk < said: > I have noticed the following situation: > PRU_OLDSTYLE has been removed from "sys/protosw.h". > If you include netkey, netatalk, or netns, the current kernel panics > in domaininit. Right. This is intentional. > Even when you specify PRU_OLDSTYLE, a kernel won't compile because > "extern struct pr_usrreqs pru_oldstyle" is missing in "sys/protosw.h". Right. This is intentional. > My question is: > should all the existing protocols move to the new pr_usrreqs? That has been the intent all along. Just need somebody with the time who can update and test each stack. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick