Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 6 May 1997 13:27:25 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To:        Kenjiro Cho <kjc@csl.sony.co.jp>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   PRU_OLDSTYLE in current
Message-ID:  <199705061727.NAA18499@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199705061629.BAA01994@hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp>
References:  <199705061629.BAA01994@hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Wed, 07 May 1997 01:29:35 +0900, Kenjiro Cho <kjc@csl.sony.co.jp> said:

> I have noticed the following situation:
> PRU_OLDSTYLE has been removed from "sys/protosw.h".
> If you include netkey, netatalk, or netns, the current kernel panics
> in domaininit.

Right.  This is intentional.

> Even when you specify PRU_OLDSTYLE, a kernel won't compile because 
> "extern struct pr_usrreqs pru_oldstyle" is missing in "sys/protosw.h".

Right.  This is intentional.

> My question is:
> should all the existing protocols move to the new pr_usrreqs?

That has been the intent all along.  Just need somebody with the time
who can update and test each stack.

-GAWollman

--
Garrett A. Wollman   | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same
wollman@lcs.mit.edu  | O Siem / The fires of freedom 
Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame
MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA|                     - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705061727.NAA18499>