From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 9 03:31:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F256544A for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 03:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD1A32D5 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 03:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.27] (rbn1-216-180-76-205.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.205]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s893V7Tk003323 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 22:31:07 -0500 Message-ID: <540E75F2.7060709@hiwaay.net> Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 22:37:22 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: here we go again w/ pkg .... References: <540E1D24.5090407@hiwaay.net> <540E31C0.8060808@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <540E31C0.8060808@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 03:31:10 -0000 On 09/08/14 17:46, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 08/09/2014 22:18, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> root@kabini1, /etc, 4:11:53pm] 568 % pkg version -vIL= >> curl-7.37.1_2 < needs updating (index has 7.37.1_3) >> gtk2-2.24.22_3 < needs updating (index has 2.24.22_4) >> libyaml-0.1.6 < needs updating (index has 0.1.6_1) >> pango-1.34.1_6 < needs updating (index has 1.34.1_7) >> portmaster-3.17.6 < needs updating (index has 3.17.7) >> readline-6.3.6_1 < needs updating (index has 6.3.8) >> [root@kabini1, /etc, 4:11:57pm] 569 % pkg version -vRL= >> Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... >> FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. >> Updating FreeBSD_new_xorg repository catalogue... >> FreeBSD_new_xorg repository is up-to-date. >> All repositories are up-to-date. >> db46-4.6.21.4 ? orphaned: databases/db46 >> dri-9.1.7_4,2 > succeeds remote (remote has >> 7.6.1_4,2) >> libGL-9.1.7_1 > succeeds remote (remote has 7.6.1_4) >> libdrm-2.4.52,1 > succeeds remote (remote has >> 2.4.17_1,1) >> linux-f10-expat-2.0.1 ? orphaned: textproc/linux-f10-expat >> linux-f10-fontconfig-2.6.0 ? orphaned: >> x11-fonts/linux-f10-fontconfig >> linux-f10-xorg-libs-7.4_1 ? orphaned: x11/linux-f10-xorg-libs >> opera-linuxplugins-12.16 ? orphaned: www/opera-linuxplugins >> xf86-video-intel-2.21.15_3 > succeeds remote (remote has 2.7.1_8) >> xorg-server-1.12.4_8,1 > succeeds remote (remote has >> 1.7.7_13,1) > It's the 'pkg version -vRL=' output which is pertinent when you're > trying to update using binary packages from the repository. In this > case it is clear that you have already upgraded (by portmaster(8) or > otherwise) using a more recent ports tree -- probably not the one with > the INDEX that shows some out of date packages. There simply aren't any > /newer/ binary packages available that what you already have installed, > so pkg(8) doesn't do anything. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > I didn't do an actual ports update, just checked, using: portmaster -L | egrep '(ew|ort) version|total install' .... I guess that's enough to mess up pkg ? -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.