From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 17 15:00:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA40416A4CE for ; Tue, 17 May 2005 15:00:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF0343D9E for ; Tue, 17 May 2005 15:00:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@irotas.net) Received: from web1.messagingengine.com (web1.internal [10.202.2.210]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05132C8FC10; Tue, 17 May 2005 11:00:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: by web1.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 748974940; Tue, 17 May 2005 11:00:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1116342038.12591.234323975@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: ovFj08WGTDzLM+zlAqne5gaoO4tsLyU/vfI4WzjFfl/J 1116342038 From: "Adam McLaurin" To: "Chuck Swiger" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 1.5 (F2.73; T1.001; A1.64; B3.05; Q3.03) References: <1116297146.4271.234280167@webmail.messagingengine.com> <4289E51A.2030501@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <4289E51A.2030501@mac.com> Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 11:00:38 -0400 cc: FreeBSD-Ports Subject: Re: net/libnet vs net/libnet-devel X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 15:00:43 -0000 Hi Chuck, I suspect that many ports actually depend on net/libnet-devel (e.g., net-mgmt/ettercap). Is there any precedence to keep the arcane 1.0.x around (maybe net/libnet-old). That way net/libnet could be 1.1.2.1, and net/libnet-devel could be 1.1.3. Thanks, Adam On Tue, 17 May 2005 08:35:38 -0400, "Chuck Swiger" said: > Adam McLaurin wrote: > > Is there a particlar reason why we're hanging on to net/libnet v1.0.2a? > > Yeah, libnet-1.1.x isn't API compatible with the 1.0.x stuff, and a fair > amount > of code (read "dependant ports") doesn't work with the newer version, > although > they wouldn't be hard to fix, either. > > -- > -Chuck >