Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 17:46:54 -0400 From: "Josh Carroll" <josh.carroll@gmail.com> To: "Kris Kennaway" <kris@freebsd.org> Cc: Maxim Khitrov <mkhitrov@gmail.com>, Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building a new workstation - dual or quad-core CPU for FreeBSD 7? Message-ID: <8cb6106e0709151446x4c54a520u2d5cd543ba1541e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <46EC50DA.6000104@FreeBSD.org> References: <26ddd1750709141351i3646e9bdg8d8b7e93461167f9@mail.gmail.com> <bef9a7920709141441r5c228a8bu1fcf2ea15868c3c@mail.gmail.com> <26ddd1750709151014x2112b022r9bcb999fbf1e7e49@mail.gmail.com> <46EC270A.3020100@FreeBSD.org> <8cb6106e0709151421h7bfdeb6fo7dc671820294e9c7@mail.gmail.com> <46EC4F59.7070104@FreeBSD.org> <8cb6106e0709151435p72cd328by63895421f3a63ea4@mail.gmail.com> <46EC50DA.6000104@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> That's good to know. You should be using libthr for threaded > performance though :) That benchmark is probably almost all userland > though, so performance may not suffer much from libpthread. Oh I wasn't sure if libthr was the preferred thread library for 6.2 also (I'd heard that was the case for -CURRENT). I should look into whether ffmpeg can be built with libthr instead and compare performance. Somewhat off topic, so I'll leave it at that, but thanks again for the great info. I'm really looking forward to 7.0-RELEASE, obviously :) Josh
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8cb6106e0709151446x4c54a520u2d5cd543ba1541e>