From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 20 04:41:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1978416A402 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 04:41:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CDD943D5D for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 04:41:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3K4dY1R009098; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:39:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:39:33 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20060419.223933.67679418.imp@bsdimp.com> To: bms@spc.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20060419233325.GF28496@spc.org> References: <20060419233325.GF28496@spc.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, livefreebsd@mac.com Subject: Re: cPCI Hotplug support X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 04:41:28 -0000 In message: <20060419233325.GF28496@spc.org> Bruce M Simpson writes: : On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 01:12:53PM -0400, livefreebsd@mac.com wrote: : > Does 6.0 not support hot-swap Compact PCI? : : No, to the best of my knowledge. 6.0 supports Compact PCI machines that are also hot-swap. It doesn't support hot-swapping the cards. : > Can we port the code for this from Linux? : : Not really, unless you're referring to code for specific enclosure : hotplug controllers; the code in Linux is of course GPL encumbered. : : Some other things need to change in the PCI code for this to really : be possible (multiple PCI nexus instances, for example, and the ability : to renumber the buses correctly when a new bus is plugged in). Or conversely the ability to number the busses sanely to start with... There's a big problem with renumbering the busses on the fly... Warner