From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 4 06:06:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35912106566C; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 06:06:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E519E8FC08; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 06:06:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from bb.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.89]) by services.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1MC66F-000GGl-NZ; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:06:51 +0400 To: glarkin@FreeBSD.org References: <4A242BF1.9050202@FreeBSD.org> <22672149@h30.sp.ipt.ru> <4A26BB95.7010002@FreeBSD.org> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:06:52 +0400 In-Reply-To: <4A26BB95.7010002@FreeBSD.org> (Greg Larkin's message of "Wed\, 03 Jun 2009 14\:06\:13 -0400") Message-ID: <01209091@bb.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Fix for CONFLICTS in emulators/linux_base ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 06:06:53 -0000 On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:06:13 -0400 Greg Larkin wrote: > Boris Samorodov wrote: > > (Seems I've got this mail by private email and send an answer. > > but for archieves I'll duplicate it here.) > > > > On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:28:49 -0400 Greg Larkin wrote: > > > >> Hi emulation team, > > > >> I'm working on a PR for graphics/linux-ac3d, and it required me to > >> upgrade my linux_base-fc-4_14 package. I noticed that the newer > >> linux_base-f ports don't include the correct package name in CONFLICTS > >> for the older port. > > > > Thanks for taking care of it. I should have done it myself but > > you know there are always other first-aid-things to do... :-( > > > >> I have included a patch for the ports that you maintain. Please review > >> it when you have a moment and let me know what you think. > > > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~glarkin/diffs/bsam-linux_base.diff > > > > Some thoughts: > > . I'm not sure if names without * can match anything (and > > anyway if they do, ex. linux_base-fc will match linux_base-fc6, > > the third diff); > > . there are more linux_base ports now (including linux_base-f9, > > linux_base-f10). They should be included into CONFLICTS and > > their CONFLICTS should be considered either. > Hi Boris, > I sent two emails with two separate patches, one directly to you and one > to emulation@, since I wasn't sure who is a member of that alias. Sorry > for the confusion on my end. No problem. > Perhaps there is a very simple solution - do you think that all > linux_base ports should have the following CONFLICTS line? > CONFLICTS= linux_base-* > That way, all Linux emulation layers will conflict with every other one, > and we'll be covered for any future revisions. Did you try it yourself? ;-) That way every linux base port will conflict with itself! > Let me know what you think, and I can commit the changes after > generating a new patch for your review, if you like. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve