From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 20 18:23:52 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EDA216A4CE
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 18:23:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from bas.flux.utah.edu (bas.flux.utah.edu [155.98.60.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4D843D62
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 18:23:49 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mac@dmedia.ws)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by bas.flux.utah.edu (8.12.9/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i6KINmwN084315;
	Tue, 20 Jul 2004 12:23:48 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from mac@dmedia.ws)
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 12:23:48 -0600 (MDT)
From: Mac Newbold <mac@dmedia.ws>
X-X-Sender: newbold@bas.flux.utah.edu
To: Andrew Heybey <ath@niksun.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040720121813.4362a24a@stiegl.mj.niksun.com>
Message-ID: <20040720105934.N78807@bas.flux.utah.edu>
References: <20040720121813.4362a24a@stiegl.mj.niksun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: mac@dmedia.ws
cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: xemacs port on 5.2-CURRENT
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 18:23:52 -0000

Today at 12:18pm, Andrew Heybey said:

>It is not just in -CURRENT.  I just had the same problem after doing a
>portupgrade of xemacs on my 4.9-RELEASE system.

I've got two 4.10-STABLE systems that don't have this problem at all, even
though I've portupgraded them similarly to the 5.2-CURRENT box.

>Put the attached patch file in the editors/xemacs/files directory.
>The bug is that src/mem-limits.h is patched by the port to declare
>the variable "lim_data" as type rlim_t (which is a 64-bit number) but
>emacs.c still defines it as an int.  I am going to submit a PR.

Thanks a ton! I applied the one-line patch and it works great now.

Thanks,
Mac

--
Mac Newbold		Digital Media Consulting, LLC
mac@dmedia.ws		http://www.dmedia.ws/