From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 21 22:20:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC2716A41F for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:20:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D1643D64 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:20:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBLMK99c028874 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:20:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jBLMK9iC028873; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:20:09 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:20:09 GMT Message-Id: <200512212220.jBLMK9iC028873@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Matthias Andree Cc: Subject: Re: ports/90729: databases/db[0-9]*: check USE_BDB knob X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Andree List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:20:12 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/90729; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Matthias Andree To: Pav Lucistnik Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/90729: databases/db[0-9]*: check USE_BDB knob Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:09:03 +0100 root@libertas# uname -prs FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE i386 root@libertas# cd /usr/ports/mail/bogofilter && make clean USE_BDB=blah ===> Cleaning for db43-4.3.29 ===> Cleaning for libtool-1.3.5_2 ===> Cleaning for libtool-1.5.20 ===> Cleaning for perl-5.8.7_1 ===> Cleaning for gsl-1.6 ===> Cleaning for bogofilter-1.0.0 root@libertas# cd /usr/ports && make clean USE_BDB=blah ===> accessibility ===> accessibility/at-spi ===> Cleaning for atk-1.10.3 ===> Cleaning for gail-1.8.8 ===> Cleaning for libiconv-1.9.2_1 ===> Cleaning for ORBit2-2.12.4_1 ===> Cleaning for bison-1.75_2,1 ===> Cleaning for gettext-0.14.5 ===> Cleaning for glib-2.8.4 ===> Cleaning for gmake-3.80_2 ===> Cleaning for imake-6.8.2 ===> Cleaning for libIDL-0.8.6_1 ===> Cleaning for libbonobo-2.10.1_2 ===> Cleaning for libglade2-2.5.1_3 ===> Cleaning for libtool-1.5.20 ===> Cleaning for m4-1.4.4 ===> Cleaning for pkgconfig-0.20 ===> Cleaning for popt-1.7 ===> Cleaning for cairo-1.0.2_1 ===> Cleaning for jpeg-6b_3 ===> Cleaning for libart_lgpl2-2.3.17 ===> Cleaning for libgnomecanvas-2.12.0 ===> Cleaning for png-1.2.8_2 ===> Cleaning for tiff-3.7.4 ===> Cleaning for perl-5.8.7_1 ===> Cleaning for python-2.4.2 ===> Cleaning for gnomehier-2.0_7 ===> Cleaning for hicolor-icon-theme-0.5 ===> Cleaning for shared-mime-info-0.16_2 ===> Cleaning for freetype2-2.1.10_2 ===> Cleaning for expat-1.95.8_3 ===> Cleaning for intltool-0.34.1 ===> Cleaning for libxml2-2.6.22 ===> Cleaning for p5-XML-Parser-2.34_1 ===> Cleaning for xmlcatmgr-2.2 ===> Cleaning for bitstream-vera-1.10_2 ===> Cleaning for fontconfig-2.3.2,1 ===> Cleaning for libXft-2.1.7 ===> Cleaning for xorg-fonts-encodings-6.8.2 ===> Cleaning for xorg-fonts-truetype-6.8.2 ===> Cleaning for gtk-2.8.9 ===> Cleaning for pango-1.10.2 ===> Cleaning for xorg-clients-6.8.2_1 ===> Cleaning for xorg-libraries-6.8.2 ===> Cleaning for xterm-206_1 ===> Cleaning for at-spi-1.6.6_1 ===> accessibility/atk ===> Cleaning for libiconv-1.9.2_1 ===> Cleaning for gettext-0.14.5 ===> Cleaning for glib-2.8.4 ===> Cleaning for gmake-3.80_2 ===> Cleaning for libtool-1.5.20 ===> Cleaning for pkgconfig-0.20 ===> Cleaning for perl-5.8.7_1 ===> Cleaning for atk-1.10.3 ===> accessibility/dasher ... What problem is the patch trying to fix? I see none until here. Using other targets, we get: root@libertas# cd /usr/ports/databases/db42 && make USE_BDB=blah ===> db42-4.2.52_4 Unknown bdb version: blah. And why would the port need to be fixed rather than bsd.database.mk? -- Matthias Andree