From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Sep  2 16:43:13 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: python@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0784F106566C;
	Sun,  2 Sep 2012 16:43:13 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lwhsu@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw)
Received: from FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw (FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw [140.113.17.209])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48CE8FC0A;
	Sun,  2 Sep 2012 16:43:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw (Postfix, from userid 1058)
	id 29E7461CE0; Mon,  3 Sep 2012 00:37:29 +0800 (CST)
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 00:37:29 +0800
From: Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@FreeBSD.org>
To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru>
Message-ID: <20120902163729.GA42749@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw>
References: <50430B39.6040707@yandex.ru>
	<CAKBkRUyV_CBTdY4xN7K_6PH4rQN80oU9+pQpscbmdLz-qAW_NQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<50434AAF.7070005@yandex.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="jI8keyz6grp/JLjh"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <50434AAF.7070005@yandex.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: python <python@freebsd.org>, portmgr@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Simple change into Mk/bsd.python.mk
X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues <freebsd-python.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-python-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-python>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-python@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-python-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python>,
	<mailto:freebsd-python-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 16:43:13 -0000


--jI8keyz6grp/JLjh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 16:01:51 +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> 
> I believe that original intention was not to hardcode the zope port 
> version. Yes, there is only one zope version at the moment, but there 
> may be more in future. Just though about ports that needs different zope 
> versions. Please tell me if I understand it wrong.
> 

We have the same thought.  Sorry that my expression was not clear.
My proposed patch is attached, and what I just wanted was reducing
hardcoded dependency of ${LOCALBASE}/bin/zopectl .  I am not sure which
one is better, so please just commit one you like.

BTW, should we bother portmgr at this point?  I believe they have much
more important things need to deal with.  But I am still happy to hear
any suggestion from them if they want to step in.

Regards,
Li-Wen

-- 
Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@FreeBSD.org>
http://lwhsu.org

--jI8keyz6grp/JLjh--